|
Please find the news
coverage on a panel discussion on titled 'Ecological debt: we are the
creditors' held in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 27th where Lidy Nacpil of
JS-APMDD spoke as the key discussant. ....
Regards
DOHA/ EquityBD
Poor countries should be given
reparation for ecological damage
The money that Northern nations give to the Southern
elite isn’t debt
Staff
Correspondent
Bangladesh and
other Third World countries deserve
reparation for the numerous damages to their ecologies and economies
caused by industrially developed countries of the North, said an
internationally renowned development activist, calling on Southern
nations to raise their voices to reinforce the demand. Lidy B Nacpil, one of the leading
advocates of the ‘alternative development approach’, insisted on the
recognition by advanced countries of their ‘ecological debt’ to the
currently poor nations and payment of reparation, although the losses
can never be correctly calculated and properly monetized.
‘Recognition of ecological debt should be
a part of climate justice. We are demanding what they owe and this is a
feasible political process,’ she said at a panel discussion in Dhaka on Monday evening, emphasising the
importance of making the movement international. A coalition of rights
organisations organised the discussion titled ‘Ecological Debt: We are
the Creditors’ at the National Press Club to build awareness of the
rational demands of Bangladesh as a vulnerable country prior to the
Copenhagen Climate Conference in December 2009.
Lidy Nacpil,
convener of the Jubilee South Asia-Pacific Movement on Debt and
Development, identified the governments of the industrially developed
countries and international financial institutions, including the World
Bank and International Monetary Fund, and trans-national corporations
as the debtors. The Latin American countries of Bolivia,
Venezuela and Paraguay and also two Asian countries — Malaysia and Sri
Lanka — have already formally claimed the climate debt at the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, she pointed out. Referring to $3.1
trillion external debt at present, Lidy explained that this was not
debt and that this amount would be ‘very small’ if the losses incurred
by Third World countries were
calculated and added up.
‘They
exploited us, took away more than their fair share of resources and
caused severe damage to the ecology,’ said Lidy, a Filipino national,
adding that the losses were so high that the countries responsible for
them would not be able to compensate the victims fully. ‘We want
justice and they must admit that they have caused incalculable damage.’
When
she was asked whether the demand was for reparation through
cancellation of financial debt, if not ecological debt, she said all
the contracts should have provisions to review and address injustice,
and accused the developed countries of breaching contracts by all forms
of exploitation. ‘The money which the
Northern governments are giving to the Southern elite is not debt,’ she
maintained. ‘We are not going to solve the outstanding
problems unless there is a radical change in global governance,’ said
Sarba Raj Khadka of the South Asia Alliance for Poverty Eradication. Pias Karim, a teacher of economics at BRAC University, contended that the
call for repayment of ecological debt was democratic and said, ‘Let us
articulate it.’
Rezaul
Karim Chowdhury of EquityBD, Ahmed Swapan Mahmud of VOICE South Asia and Uma Chowdhury of SUPRO also took part
in the discussion, which was moderated by Mohiuddin Ahmed, a
development activist.
|