WE ARE NO DEBTORS!  WE ARE CREDITORS OF A HISTORICAL, SOCIAL  AND ECOLOGICAL DEBT!
Poor countries should be given reparation for ecological damage E-mail
Friday, 31 July 2009

Please find the news coverage on a panel discussion on titled 'Ecological debt: we are the creditors' held in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 27th where Lidy Nacpil of JS-APMDD spoke as the key discussant. ....

Regards

DOHA/ EquityBD  

Poor countries should be given reparation for ecological damage
The money that Northern nations give to the Southern elite isn’t debt

Staff Correspondent

Bangladesh and other Third World countries deserve reparation for the numerous damages to their ecologies and economies caused by industrially developed countries of the North, said an internationally renowned development activist, calling on Southern nations to raise their voices to reinforce the demand. Lidy B Nacpil, one of the leading advocates of the ‘alternative development approach’, insisted on the recognition by advanced countries of their ‘ecological debt’ to the currently poor nations and payment of reparation, although the losses can never be correctly calculated and properly monetized.


‘Recognition of ecological debt should be a part of climate justice. We are demanding what they owe and this is a feasible political process,’ she said at a panel discussion in Dhaka on Monday evening, emphasising the importance of making the movement international. A coalition of rights organisations organised the discussion titled ‘Ecological Debt: We are the Creditors’ at the National Press Club to build awareness of the rational demands of Bangladesh as a vulnerable country prior to the Copenhagen Climate Conference in December 2009.


Lidy Nacpil, convener of the Jubilee South Asia-Pacific Movement on Debt and Development, identified the governments of the industrially developed countries and international financial institutions, including the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, and trans-national corporations as the debtors. The Latin American countries of Bolivia, Venezuela and Paraguay and also two Asian countries — Malaysia and Sri Lanka — have already formally claimed the climate debt at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, she pointed out. Referring to $3.1 trillion external debt at present, Lidy explained that this was not debt and that this amount would be ‘very small’ if the losses incurred by Third World countries were calculated and added up.

‘They exploited us, took away more than their fair share of resources and caused severe damage to the ecology,’ said Lidy, a Filipino national, adding that the losses were so high that the countries responsible for them would not be able to compensate the victims fully. ‘We want justice and they must admit that they have caused incalculable damage.’

When she was asked whether the demand was for reparation through cancellation of financial debt, if not ecological debt, she said all the contracts should have provisions to review and address injustice, and accused the developed countries of breaching contracts by all forms of exploitation. ‘The money which the Northern governments are giving to the Southern elite is not debt,’ she maintained. ‘We are not going to solve the outstanding problems unless there is a radical change in global governance,’ said Sarba Raj Khadka of the South Asia Alliance for Poverty Eradication. Pias Karim, a teacher of economics at BRAC University, contended that the call for repayment of ecological debt was democratic and said, ‘Let us articulate it.’
  

Rezaul Karim Chowdhury of EquityBD, Ahmed Swapan Mahmud of VOICE South Asia and Uma Chowdhury of SUPRO also took part in the discussion, which was moderated by Mohiuddin Ahmed, a development activist.


 
< Prev   Next >
© 2012 Ecological Debt
Joomla! es Software Libre distribuido bajo licencia GNU/GPL.